In the article we were assigned Ditkoff expanded on several ideas from some of the greatest minds in history. Such as Einsteins quote “Not Everything that can be counted counts; and not everything that counts can be counted” or Edisons “I didn’t fail once. I learned 800 times what didn’t work.” He takes these quotes and expands on them giving them a deeper meaning. He relates Edison’s quote to tolerance of ambiguity, meaning that he was ok with not knowing and to be totally creative you can’t be overly critical of yourself.
Ditkoff grabbed me on the first page when he started to describe the two types of thinking. Western which he boiled down to “I think therefore I am” and Eastern that he expressed as “I am, therefore I think.” I personally stopped after the second quote, ignoring the last sentence in the paragraph, I thought to myself which of the two do I fall under. I then decided that this guy was full of shit, because I fell under both. I then read the next paragraph, where he goes on to say that everyone dips into both philosophies at different times due to various circumstances, realizing this guy knew what he was talking about.
Ditkoff also wrote in a style similar to my own. It wasn’t a dry read he expressed opinions and humor and in my opinion that is lacking far too much in literature in general. He even manages to slide in a Simpsons reference! It’s as if the one place in media you can’t change the established norm is in literature, so I applaud him for taking what five years ago would have been considered a dangerous approach to it.
I think the article can be summed up best with letting go. The majority of the 14 Ways deal with fantasizing and throwing logic out the door, a dare to dream type of recommendation. Once you’ve done that nurture the idea and strive to bring it to fruition.
Ditkoff grabbed me on the first page when he started to describe the two types of thinking. Western which he boiled down to “I think therefore I am” and Eastern that he expressed as “I am, therefore I think.” I personally stopped after the second quote, ignoring the last sentence in the paragraph, I thought to myself which of the two do I fall under. I then decided that this guy was full of shit, because I fell under both. I then read the next paragraph, where he goes on to say that everyone dips into both philosophies at different times due to various circumstances, realizing this guy knew what he was talking about.
Ditkoff also wrote in a style similar to my own. It wasn’t a dry read he expressed opinions and humor and in my opinion that is lacking far too much in literature in general. He even manages to slide in a Simpsons reference! It’s as if the one place in media you can’t change the established norm is in literature, so I applaud him for taking what five years ago would have been considered a dangerous approach to it.
I think the article can be summed up best with letting go. The majority of the 14 Ways deal with fantasizing and throwing logic out the door, a dare to dream type of recommendation. Once you’ve done that nurture the idea and strive to bring it to fruition.
5 Ditkoff asks us to think of a current challenge of ours. What would a fantasy solution to this challenge look like? What clues does this fantasy solution give? I’ve been having some issues at work there technical issues that would easily be solved with new equipment. The owner of course doesn’t want to spend cash to fix these issues he thinks we should just repair the broken equipment not replace it. So for the past week or two I’ve been fantasizing about killing him(not really), but this in a way shows me what I need to do. I need to get the boss out of the way. My fantasy of him dead shows him out of the way so I need to explore if there is a way to obtain this. No I don’t mean kill him, but make it so that he can’t object to it convey it in a way he has no way of shooting it down.
6 Ditkoff also says we need to define the right challenge. That we need to state our most
inspired challenge or opportunity as a question beginning with words “How can I?” Then to write it five different ways. Which is the real question?
How can I get the boss to purchase new equipment?
How can I get new equipment purchased?
How can I purchase the equipment?
How can I make the boss realize we need new equipment?
How can I repair the old equipment so that we don’t need new equipment?
The real question is; How can I make the boss realize we need new equipment? I need to make him realize the road we’re going down with constant repairs isn’t as feesable as new stuff. Sometimes it becomes to costly to keep making the repairs.
9 Ditkoff challenges us, to challenge existing trends. What trends in the marketplace most intrigue us? In what ways might these trends shift in the coming years-and how might your most inspired idea be in sync with this imagined shift? I’m currently most intrigued by the 3D wave. I think we’ll see a huge shift to 3D in the coming years but I don’t think it will be permanent I think that it will only be temporary and shift back. So my idea would be to further the development of 2D or perhaps a TV that has both options of 3D and 2D. Lets face it though I don’t have anywhere near the funding for this type of project.
Ditkoff however suggest that’s just another idea.
How can I get the money to invent my TV.
How can I…